Showing posts with label salvation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label salvation. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 19, 2021

Chapter 10 Excerpt -- Savior

We now get to the final word about God in the book I plan to self-publish by the end of the week: God with Ten Words:

_____________________

God is our Savior. Although it may not fit with the way we normally think, salvation is part of biblical justice. Biblical justice is about putting things right, which means that God has “brought down the powerful from thrones and exalted the humble” (Luke 1:52). For a season, God may allow evil for reasons we have already seen. But evil is never the final answer.

God allows evil because it is better for us to freely choose the good rather than be forced to do the good. The corollary action of God is for salvation. Counterbalancing the constant presence of evil in the world is the constant action of God for salvation in the world. The culmination of this action was and is of course in Christ.

The thread of salvation runs throughout the Bible. Typically, we are well acquainted with God’s actions toward eternal salvation. We know the storyline of Scripture. Sin entered the world, and death through sin. Jesus came to destroy the power of Sin and death and free us to eternal life. This is the lens of salvation through which Christians predominantly read the Bible.

In much of Christianity, this story is read as a personal story. That is to say, it is a story about me and my individual salvation. It is also a spiritual story about my eternal, individual destination. Of course that thread of the story is true.

It also is only part of the story of salvation in Scripture. For one, this story of personal salvation in Paul’s writings is even more a story of corporate salvation. It is also a cosmic salvation, the setting right of all things. It is our culture that leads us to focus on our individual piece of that puzzle. The biblical world was a more group-oriented world. The story of salvation in Romans and Paul’s letters is thus more a story of God's people being saved together rather than mere individual salvation. Election in Paul is more about us collectively and God’s plan corporately than about any individual’s salvation.

Friday, March 30, 2018

6.3 After Incorporation

Chapter 6: Salvation
6.1 Predestination and Election'
6.2 The Conditions of Salvation

6.3 After Incorporation
6.3.1 Faith and Repentance
  • We walk by faith and not by sight (2 Cor. 5:7).
  • Hebrews 11--the faith chapter gives examples of faith among God's people (e.g., 11:6).
  • Confession of sins (2:1--1:9 is more about pre-Christian sins)
  • 2 Corinthians 7:10
  • Progressive glorification! 2 Corinthians 3:18
6.3.2 Christian Maturity (a.k.a. entire sanctification)
  • Hebrews 6:1--"Let us go into perfection"
  • Philippians 3:15--"As many of us as are mature"
  • 1 Thessalonians 5:23--"May God sanctify you entirely"
  • Matthew 5:48--"Be complete as your heavenly Father is complete."
  • 1 Peter 1:15-16--"Be holy as I am holy"
6.3.3 Falling Away
  • The Apostle Paul: 1 Cor. 9:24-27; Phil. 3:10-12--Paul did not consider his own resurrection, glorification guaranteed.
  • Romans 8:31-39 is talking about external forces, not a believer separating him or herself.
  • Romans 11:19-21 speaks of branches that are grafted in being grafted back out.
  • Hebrews and Apostasy: 3:14; 6:4-6; 10:26-27; 12:16-17
  • John is more deterministic in its language. Speaks of individuals that leave having never truly been in (e.g., 1 John 2:19). However, "no one can take them out of my hand" is again about external forces rather than internal ones (John 10:28).
6.3.4 Final Justification
  • 2 Corinthians 5:1-10 final justification by works
  • Romans 2:5-10--final judgment according to works
  • James 2--justification by faith and works
6.4 Proclamation of the Gospel (consider moving to Christology)
6.4.1 What is the Gospel?
  • The pre-gospel in the Synoptics--good news of the kingdom of God, the approaching reign of God, in earth as in heaven
  • 1 Corinthians 15:1-8--good news of the death, resurrection, and lordship of Jesus, and all that it entails.
  • Romans 1:3-4--Jesus is king!
  • The good news is that Jesus is Lord, and all that it entails.
6.4.2 The Great Commission
  • Matthew 28:19-20--Go make disciples, baptizing, teaching
  • 1 Corinthians 1:21--God has chosen to save the world using proclamation
  • Preaching is the norm for evangelization--Romans 10:14-17
  • Acts 1:8--the apostolic witness to the resurrection
6.4.3 Anonymous Christians?
  • Beyond Israel--Abraham as a model (Gen. 15; Rom. 4; cf. Job, Nineveh)
  • Romans 1:20--natural revelation and general knowledge of God
  • Acts 17:27--nature as basis for seeking God
  • John 1:9--the lighting of everyone
  • A possible theology of prevenient grace
Previous "chapters"
Chapter 1: What is Biblical Theology?
Chapter 2: Theology of God
Chapter 3: Creation and Consummation
Chapter 4: Sin and Atonement
Interlude: A Theology of Israel
Chapter 5: Jesus the Christ

Friday, March 23, 2018

6.2 The Conditions of Salvation

Chapter 6: Salvation
6.1 Predestination and Election'

6.2 The Conditions of Salvation
6.2.1 The Rule of Faith
  • The Pelagian Controversy
  • The Calvinist Perspective (monergism)
  • The Arminian Perspective (synergism)
6.2.2 What is Salvation?
  • In most New Testament uses of the word soteria, future escape from the wrath/judgment of God is in view.
  • 1 Thessalonians 5:9
  • Romans 5:9
  • Romans 13:11
  • 1 Peter 1:4-5
  • Likely proleptic references: 2 Corinthians 6:2; Ephesians 2:8-10
  • Other meanings for the sozo root: Luke 1:68-71; 7:50
6.2.3 Grace
  • Grace in the Mediterranean world (John Barclay)
  • The righteousness of God (Rom. 1:16-17)
  • Romans 3:24
  • Romans 4
  • Ephesians 2:8
6.2.4 Repentance
  • Acts 2:37-38
  • Acts 17:29-31
6.2.5 Faith versus Works
  • Galatians 2:16-21
  • Romans 3:21-31
  • Ephesians 2:8-10
  • James 2
6.2.6 Confession
  • Romans 10:9-13 (the Roman Road)
  • 1 John 1:9
  • Hebrew 3:1
6.2.7 Baptism
  • Acts 2:37-28
  • The theology of Acts
  • Matthew 28
  • Baptism in the early church
6.2.8 The Holy Spirit
  • The theology of Acts
  • 2 Cor. 1:22; 5:5 (seal of ownership, earnest)
  • Rom. 8:9
  • Eph. 1:13-14
Previous "chapters"
Chapter 1: What is Biblical Theology?
Chapter 2: Theology of God
Chapter 3: Creation and Consummation
Chapter 4: Sin and Atonement
Interlude: A Theology of Israel
Chapter 5: Jesus the Christ

Sunday, March 08, 2015

Wesleyan-Arminian Reflections on Christ and Salvation

Here are now the links to my reflections on the first two parts of my ongoing series on theology from a Wesleyan-Arminian perspective. These are in my "theology in bullet points" series. I'm almost ready to self-publish Part 1. Part 2 is now finished as of today. I'll start the final section next Sunday.

Part 1: God and Creation
God and Creation

Part 2: Christ and Salvation
The Doctrine of Christ (Christology)
1. Christ has been the Son of God from eternity past.
2. Jesus is "God with us," God's Word become flesh.
3. Jesus on earth was a prophet of the kingdom of God.
4. In his death, Jesus became the priest of all humanity and creation.
5. In his resurrection, Jesus became the king of all humanity and creation.

The Doctrine of Atonement 
1. God chose Christ's death as the means to reconcile the world to himself.
2. In his death, Jesus showed us the love of God.
3. In his death, Jesus satisfied the order of things.
4. In his death, Jesus took humanity's place.
5. In his death, Jesus defeated the power of death.

The Doctrine of Salvation (soteriology)
1. Jesus saves.
2. Saving us is part of God's plan.
3. God was reaching out for us long before we knew it.
4. God used Israel to prepare the way for Christ.
5. God justifies us in response to our repentance and faith.
6. God fills us with his Holy Spirit as a seal of ownership.
7. God adopts us as his children: we are born to new life.
8. The power of the Spirit breaks the power of Sin.
9. The dead in Christ will rise.
10. Christ will come again to save his people and judge the world.
11. God will restore the world and we will enjoy him forever.

S11. God will restore the world and we will enjoy him forever.

This is now the eleventh and final post in a unit on salvation in my ongoing series, theology in bullet points. The first section had to do with God and Creation, and I have also finished units on Christology and Atonement.
____________
God will restore the world and we will enjoy him forever.

1. "God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life." Life that never ends is the destiny of those whose sins are atoned for by the blood of Christ.

It is the promise of Scripture for believers in Christ that "we will be with the Lord forever" (1 Thess. 4:17). In the resurrection, Jesus has already done the work to destroy death and, after the resurrection takes place and all the dead are appropriately judged, there will be no more death (1 Cor. 15:26). "This perishable body must put on imperishability, and this mortal body must put on immortality" (15:53). So believers, in their resurrection bodies, will be immortal. [1]

2. We do not know a lot of the details of eternity. But we know that "God himself will be with them; he will wipe every tear from their eyes. Death will be no more; mourning and crying and pain will be no more, for the first things have passed away" (Rev. 21:3-4). There are some who picture this eternity as boring, given the way it has been presented to them, but we should dismiss such a thought not only as foolish but impossible.

What we know is that eternity will be far more fantastic than anything we have ever experienced in this life, and it will be neverendingly so. No doubt the first moment with God would make us feel exceedingly stupid for even having such a thought. We cannot even imagine the joy, pleasure, and awesomeness of eternity.

We can imagine that there will be greater activity in heaven than there is on earth, not the boredom of a nursing home. We can imagine that there will be things to learn in heaven--will we not have the whole, redeemed universe at our disposal to explore and more? Will there not be challenges in eternity, as God gave Adam a challenge in the Garden of Eden? There may not be sex (Mark 12:25), but no doubt there will be unimaginably better things. [2]

There will be complete equality in the kingdom. Women will not be given in marriage to men (Mark 12:25), which implies that there will be no subordination of wives to husband as was the norm of the cultures at the time of the Bible's writing. Since we are now in the age of the Spirit (e.g., Acts 2:17), it would be foolish for us to perpetuate that earthly pattern now, since it is not the trajectory of the kingdom. Similarly, we should do all we can to eliminate slavery on earth, since it is contrary to the kingdom ideal.

3. We should probably take the millennium of Revelation 20 as symbolic of Christ's incipient reign now in the Church. This position is called amillennialism. The reason is that 1) Revelation is highly symbolic and 2) the idea is found nowhere else in Scripture. No core doctrine should really be based on an idea that only appears in one biblical text. Amillennialism does not take a position on how things will be in the time before Christ's return.

However, it is not heretical to hold to the two other interpretations of the millennium because this issue is not a central doctrine, let alone a matter of dogma. The postmillennial perspective tends to see the millennium as something that is a little more literal, referring to the present era of history since Christ, when the good news has increased and spread throughout the world. Postmillennial views tend to see the world becoming more and more Christian over time.

The premillennial view takes the millennium of Revelation 20 literally of a thousand year period after Christ's return and the first resurrection. As such, it does not see the final resurrection and judgment until after Christ's reign, and it would thus see the possibility of rebellion against God even after the judgment pictured in most of Revelation. Premillennialism tends to see the world as getting worse and worse before Christ's return.

Again, since Scripture is not clear on these things and Revelation is highly symbolic, this is not an issue over which Christians should fight. We will know how it is destined to play out after it plays out.

4. Another question has to do with the central location of eternity. After all, Hebrews pictures a removal of the created realm (Heb. 12:26-27). 2 Peter 3:10 says that "the elements will be dissolved with fire." Similarly, Jesus tells his followers in John that "if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, so that where I am, there you may be also" (John 14:3). This verse sounds like Jesus is preparing a place for them in heaven.

Again, since there are multiple verses that can be interpreted in different ways, the location of eternity should not be considered a matter of dogma. What is central is that we will have eternal life with Christ forever. However, the general consensus of Christian history and the dominant voice in Scripture suggests that eternity will be based on a restored earth.

So 2 Peter 3:13 goes on to say that "we wait for new heavens and a new earth." In other words, the destruction of the current elements is only in transition to a restored and renewed earth. Paul says in Romans 8 that the creation is yearning for its liberation "from its bondage to decay" (Rom. 8:21). As our bodies will be transformed into resurrection bodies, so the creation will be transformed into a new creation.

The kingdom of God will thus most likely be on earth. Jesus pictures this sort of a kingdom when he speaks of people coming from east and west and north and south to feast in the kingdom (Luke 13:29). Since Revelation 21 has the support of the rest of the New Testament, we might take its New Jerusalem as more literal than some other figures in the book.

To what then does John 14 refer? Perhaps reading the New Testament theologically we might think of the place Jesus went to prepare in heaven as a place for temporary dwelling in heaven prior to the full arrival of the kingdom of God. [3] It is hard to know whether to take the details of Revelation 21 literally, but it is always possible that the dwelling Christ prepared is in the new Jerusalem that will come down to earth.

5. The kingdom of God was inaugurated when Christ rose from the dead. Jesus brought it near when he came to earth, when he began his earthly ministry (e.g., Mark 1:15). His death made it possible and his resurrection brought his heavenly enthronement, the true commencement of his reign. His reign at this time is both "now and not yet." It has commenced. It is here. But it is not fully here yet.

When Christ returns, God will bring final salvation. He will eliminate evil and evil humanity. He will "save," free the creation from its bondage to decay. He will restore humanity and the creation to its intended glory. Christ "will reign for ever and ever" (Rev. 11:15). [4] This is the fullness of the kingdom of God, forever on earth as it is in heaven (Matt. 6:10).

Next Sunday: Sp1. The Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son."

[1] Again, the Bible does not teach that our immortal souls live forever but that our immortal bodies will live for ever. This is not our current body, but the body of our resurrection (e.g., 1 Cor. 15:44).

[2] There is no basis for the sentiment sometimes heard that we will not know our spouses in the kingdom of God. This passage merely says that there will be no marriage. Indeed, we have no way of knowing whether our resurrection bodies will even distinguish gender.

[3] By reading the Bible "theologically" I mean reading it beyond the original intentions of its authors but from a later Christian point of view that synthesizes the original words of Scripture in the light of the later clarifications the Spirit made in the Church.

[4] There is some tension between this statement in Revelation 11:15 and what Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15:28. The consensus of Christian history, however, sees all three--God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit--reigning forever.

Sunday, March 01, 2015

S10: Christ will come again to save his people and judge the world.

This is the tenth post in a unit on salvation in my ongoing series, theology in bullet points. The first section had to do with God and Creation, and I have also finished units on Christology and Atonement.
________________________________
Christ will come again to save his people and judge the world.

1. The most literal sense of the world salvation is not past or present tense, but future tense. The basis for our salvation is Christ's death in the past. We put our faith in Jesus' lordship in the present; we are justified in the present. We thus ensure our salvation now. But the event from which we are saved is the wrath of God, and that is yet to come.

"Much more surely then, now that we have been justified by his blood, will we be saved through him from the wrath of God" (Rom. 5:9). The Day of Wrath is the Day of God's judgment, when "he shall judge the living and the dead." There is a Day of Wrath, "when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed" (Rom. 2:5).

2. Paul says in Romans 1:18: "The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and wickedness of those who by their wickedness suppress the truth." Paul does not have in mind a judgment that happens at death. He never even uses the word hell anywhere in his writings. He does not have in mind a judgment that happens in this life, for "If for this life only we have hoped in Christ, we are of all people most to be pitied" (1 Cor. 15:19).

Like the rest of the New Testament, Paul believed that there would be an event on earth of judgment. "The Lord himself, with a cry of command, with the archangel’s call and with the sound of God’s trumpet, will descend from heaven" (1 Thess. 4:16). "Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see ‘the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven’ with power and great glory" (Matt. 24:30). [1]

Matthew 25:31-46 pictures a scene in which all the people of the earth are gathered before Christ for a judgment. Some receive eternal life and others eternal punishment. This is a classic text to indicate that trusting in Jesus as Lord involves more than passing a true/false text about believing in Jesus (see especially Jas. 2:14-26). True faith produces a change in our lives, and the Spirit within us produces a life that manifests itself in love.

These "fruits" are of interest to God in the judgment. "All of us must appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each may receive recompense for what has been done in the body, whether good or evil" (2 Cor. 5:10). "He will repay according to each one’s deeds: to those who by patiently doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life; while for those who are self-seeking and who obey not the truth but wickedness, there will be wrath and fury" (Rom. 2:6-8).

3. The Bible probably does not look to a distinct seven year period of persecution and distress prior to Jesus' return to earth. This idea, which first appeared in the 1800s in England, comes from an ingenious piecing together of various verses in Daniel and Revelation. But nowhere in the New Testament does it say that there will be seven years of rule by an anti-Christ figure prior to the judgment. If this is true, then it requires a special, secret knowledge of the biblical text--if God wanted believers to see this idea in the New Testament text, he has hidden it very well!

On the other hand, there are several texts that make it sound like there will be great distress in the period before Jesus' return (e.g., Mark 13; Matt. 24). A difficulty here is that teaching about Jesus' return in these passages is blurred with the events prior to the destruction of Jerusalem, which happened in AD70. Similarly, it is difficult to know how much of 2 Thessalonians 2 had to do with events in Paul's day. After all, the temple to which 2:4 would most likely refer was destroyed in AD70.

The pictures of Revelation are fantastic and also seem to picture great distress on the earth for those who serve the Lord prior to his return (e.g., 7:14). [2] Even here, however, images of John's day are blurred with those of the final judgment. [3] Only hindsight, after these events take place, will make it entirely clear which portions relate only to John's day and which to the end of time.

4. You often hear talk of a "rapture" in which believers are snatched up from the earth to escape the ordeal of the end times. This idea is based on 1 Thessalonians 4:17 which speaks of believers being caught up on the clouds to meet the descending Jesus. Similarly, Mark 13:27 speaks of God gathering his elect from the four corners of the earth.

Some do not take this language literally or critique the notion that we meet Jesus in the air to go off to heaven. [4] They might suggest that the image is similar to going out to the edge of a city to welcome a king into a city, but once you meet the king, you accompany him back into the city. This idea fits the claim that Paul gives elsewhere that Christians will participate in the judgment of angels and the world (1 Cor. 6:2-3).

So there does seem to be a "seizing" (the meaning of rapture) in parts of the New Testament, but it is not to save the elect from "the Tribulation." It is not to go off to heaven forever. It seems rather both 1) salvation from the judgment that is to come and 2) assembling us for the final judgment of evil on the earth.

Jesus comes with the resurrected saints. The people of God rise to meet him in the air. The judgment of the earth and of angels commences.

5. It is difficult to know how to systematize much of the biblical teaching on these matters. Ultimately, we will know the details after they happen. For example, there are hints in various passages that non-believers may exist beyond the judgment at Christ's return (e.g., Luke 13:29; Rev. 20:7-8). [5] However, later Christian history has generally treated these as unclear passages.

What images of the judgment we have are apocalyptic in nature. "The angels will come out and separate the evil from the righteous and throw them into the furnace of fire, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth" (Matt. 13:49-50). "Then he will say to those at his left hand, ‘You that are accursed, depart from me into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels" (Matt. 25:41). "and anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire" (Rev. 20:15).

Throughout Christian history, the dominant sense of hell is as a place where the wicked suffer in torment forever. This sense of eternal damnation comes especially from the two books I have quoted above: Matthew and Revelation. We should be cautious about how literally we take this language for two reasons. The first is the fact that it is apocalyptic language, which by its very nature is highly symbolic. The second reason is the fact that the language does not appear very much outside these two books.

For example, it is not likely that any passage in the Old Testament thinks of Sheol as a place of punishment for the wicked. Sheol in Hebrew is the place of all the dead, both righteous and wicked. A judgment for the dead only appears once in all of Paul's writings (2 Tim. 4:1). Even among references to a fiery destiny for the wicked, little is said of its duration. Is it the fire that burns forever or the people in the fire (e.g., Mark 9:48)?

A philosophical problem is the question of infinite punishment for what at least appears to be finite sin. Even Hitler, as horrendous as his sins were, did not seem to sin infinitely. In that sense, an infinite punishment seems unfair. One suggestion is that even one sin against God is infinite in magnitude. [6] But this is hardly an argument the Bible itself makes.

So Christians believe that there will be an eternal punishment for those who are not in Christ. Most believe that this will be a never ending, conscious, eternal punishment. Some look for an annihilation of the wicked after the final judgment.

But those who are in Christ will be saved from God's judgment of the world. The dead in Christ will rise, and those in Christ who are alive and remain will be caught up to meet him in the air. Then they will come back down to the earth to participate in the judgment.

S11. God will restore the world and we will enjoy him forever.

[1] N. T. Wright's attempt to see this event in relation to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD70 and this sort of language as symbolic rather than literal is unconvincing. It seems almost certain that the earliest Christians took this language literally. We can debate whether we should take this language literally, but they almost certainly did.

[2] It is significant to note, for those who come from dispensationalist traditions, that the word the does not appear in the Greek of this verse. In other words, Revelation only says that they have come out of great tribulation, not the Great Tribulation. Revelation does not clearly have a distinct period of time in mind. Dispensationalists traditions see history divided up into distinct periods of time in which God deals differently with humanity. In such traditions, the Great Tribulation is a seven year period of time at the end of history leading up to Christ's reign on earth.

[3] Any first century person would have heard clear echoes of the Roman empire in the seven kings on seven hills in Revelation 17:9-10. And most Jews would have heard "Babylon" as a code word for Rome (e.g., Rev. 18).

[4] E.g., N. T. Wright. ***

[5] These hints must make us wonder the extent to which the original authors wanted us to take some of this imagery literally.

[6] E.g., This is John Piper's position. ***

Sunday, February 22, 2015

S9. The dead in Christ will rise.

This is the ninth post in a unit on salvation in my ongoing series, theology in bullet points. The first section had to do with God and Creation, and I have also finished units on Christology and Atonement.
________________________________
The dead in Christ will rise.

1. There are many senses in which we can speak of salvation. When Christ died and rose from the dead, he saved the world, even though perhaps most of those saved were not even born. In a sense, we are saved from the power of Sin the moment the Holy Spirit enters our lives. But we will be saved literally from the judgment of God, we will escape his rejection, on the Day when the judgment takes place.

When the Holy Spirit takes hold of our lives in response to our faith, we are sanctified, we are purified of our past sins and set apart as belonging to God, as God's property. Theologically, we say that God continues to "sanctify" any parts of our life that are not fully under his power. "Those who are in the flesh cannot please God" (Rom. 8:8), and we know that there are some who have been initially sanctified to God (1 Cor. 1:2) who still are fleshly (1 Cor. 3:1). [1]

So the Spirit continues to sanctify our lives until, ideally, we come to a place of full surrender. Then we can be entirely his, to the greatest degree we know. We cannot be as empowered as possible until we are as surrendered as possible. [2]

2. John Wesley never imagined that being entirely surrendered and sanctified by God (which he actually called "Christian perfection") would mean that a person stops growing in his or her relationship with God. Nor did he think that a Christian would be unable to sin after that point. There would continue to be what he called "growth in grace" for the rest of our lives on earth, and we would continue to grow for all eternity.

The key here is that there is an infinite amount to know. There is an infinite amount to grow. The person who is fully surrendered to God in every respect they know can still learn more about God. That person can still become better at implementing their love for others. So Wesley did not see Christian perfection as a sinless perfection. Nor did he see it as a return to the perfection that Adam enjoyed before he sinned. He saw it as a certain kind of maturity in faith that was fully surrendered to God and thus fully taken over by God.

3. It is possible that, to some extent, Wesley misread Paul because he was under the influence of Calvin, the Reformation, and ultimately Augustine. Paul did not see Sin as a nature within us. Paul saw Sin as a power over us. In Romans 8, Paul says that the whole creation is currently enslaved to corruption and decay (8:20). Since our human bodies are part of that creation, there is a real sense in which temptation will always be present in our lives.

Much of the Wesleyan tradition has filtered Wesley's teaching in the light of its experiences. We still understand the idea of entire sanctification as full surrender to God. Wesleyan ministers continue to preach full surrender to God with great fervor. We can also preach with great fervor that we will never experience as much of the power of God as he wants to give us if we do not surrender ourselves fully to him. And that final surrender usually takes place in a moment of decision. It is thus often an instantaneous event in which we are filled with the Spirit afresh.

However, as long as we are in our bodies, we will experience temptation. And since the power of sin over the creation is what Augustine took to be a sin nature, there is a metaphorical sense in which even Christians will have the power of Sin as a factor in their lives for as long as they live.

4. Paul does speak of an ultimate redemption from this slavery to corruption, decay, and sin. This is the redemption that will come with resurrection. The resurrection is when the dead in Christ will rise to eternal life. Whatever is left of their mortal bodies will be transformed into a spiritual body (1 Cor. 15:42-44).

Paul teaches that the entire creation will be redeemed. The entire creation will be saved. The entire creation will be transformed.

For those who are alive at Christ's return, their bodies will be transformed to be like Christ's resurrection body (Phil. 3:21). As we have borne the image of the earthly Adam, we will bear the image of the heavenly Adam, the second Adam, Christ (1 Cor. 15:49).

If we should die before Christ returns, then we shall not all sleep, but we shall be changed (1 Cor. 15:51-52). In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, we will be transformed from the grave and will be glorified.

This classic, historical and biblical belief in resurrection is not exactly the same as the immortality of the soul. It is not incompatible with that Greek belief, but it is very distinct. In particular, Christian resurrection assumes that we will have a body in resurrection. Christians do not believe that the body of Jesus is still in a grave somewhere. We believe that Christ's body was transformed into a glorified body exactly the same as the kind of body we will have in our resurrection.

The Gospel resurrection accounts also speak of Jesus having a resurrection body. He eats in Luke 24:41-43 and shows that he is not a ghost. He offers his hands and feet to touch in both Luke 24:39 and John 20:27. We are resurrected not as spirits but as bodies. [4]

4. Glorification is a term that finds its origins in Romans 8 as well. The background is arguably Psalm 8, which originally pondered the prominence God has given humanity within the creation. However, some early Christians saw in this psalm a glory that God intended humanity to have but that we do not currently experience. "We do not yet see everything in subjection" to humanity (Heb. 2:5). Humanity "is lacking the glory of God" (Rom. 3:23). [3] Once we are justified, "we boast in our hope of sharing the glory of God" (Rom. 5:2).

This glorification is what Paul was specifically talking about in Romans 8 when he said that God would work everything together for good (8:28). God has a plan in which all those in Christ will eventually "be conformed to the image of his Son" (8:29), namely, when we are transformed either at Christ's return or when we rise from the dead.

5. What happens to us between death and resurrection? The Bible has little to say on this topic. The Bible does not have much to say about what happens to us between death and resurrection. The Old Testament, of course, has very little to say about the afterlife at all. Daniel 12:2-3 does say that those who "sleep" (i.e., the dead) will be raised either to everlasting life or everlasting contempt. Paul also uses the image of sleep (1 Thess. 4:13; 1 Cor. 15:51), leading some traditions to think that we are in a "soul sleep" between death and resurrection in which we know nothing. [5]

However, few though they be, there are some clear hints in the New Testament that the dead will be conscious in the time between death and resurrection. And this is what most Christians have believed also throughout the centuries. In Luke, for example, Jesus tells the thief on the cross that he would be with him that day in Paradise (Luke 23:43). Presumably, Jesus and the thief were not just going to be sleeping next to each other in Paradise! Similarly, Luke tells us a parable about a rich man and a beggar named Lazarus. They both wake up in the afterlife, while the brothers of the rich man are still alive. By contrast, Lazarus wakes up in pleasure, and the rich man wakes up in torment.

There are other hints. Paul in Philippians 1:23 speaks of dying and being with Christ (cf. also 2 Cor. 5:1). 1 Peter speaks of Christ visiting the dead after his death (e.g., 4:6; also 3:19-20). In Revelation 6:9-10, there seem to be martyred souls present in heaven who are able to communicate with God. So while there are some images of sleep in the New Testament, the position of common Christianity is that we will be conscious in some respect after death, even before the resurrection.

It is difficult for us to say exactly what the difference will be between the blessing of our state immediately after death and the blessing of our eternally transformed bodies. We are not in any position to know what a spirit might be, let alone a disembodied spirit. [6] What we do know, as I have heard my colleague Chris Bounds say, is that the dead are precisely that: dead. [7] They are not alive. They are not yet resurrected. Their bliss is not yet as great as it will be. There is a difference between the resurrection and whatever an immortal soul might be.

The dead in Christ will rise. They will be glorified. They will receive a transformed body. Those in Christ who are alive and remain at his coming will be transformed to have a body like Christ's glorious body.

Next Sunday, S10: Christ will come again to save his people and judge the world.

[1] Wesleyans call this point the moment of initial sanctification.

[2] Wesleyans call this possibility the moment of entire sanctification.

[3] My translation.

[4] Although they may not recognize some conflicting imagery in the Bible, two books that present the case that the Bible is overwhelmingly oriented toward bodily resurrection are Joel Green's Body, Soul, and Human Life: The Nature of Humanity in the Bible (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008) and N. T. Wright's Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church (San Francisco: HarperOne, 2008).

[5] E.g., Seventh Day Adventists.

[6] Some have proposed that we will have some sort of temporary body between death and resurrection.

[7] Chris Bounds is a theology professor at Indiana Wesleyan University.

Sunday, February 15, 2015

S8. The power of the Spirit breaks the power of Sin.

This is the eighth post in a unit on salvation in my ongoing series, theology in bullet points. The first section had to do with God and Creation, and I have also finished units on Christology and Atonement.
________________________________
The power of the Spirit breaks the power of Sin.

1. "Since we are justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ... and we boast in our hope of sharing the glory of God" (Rom. 5:1-2). By his grace, God has initiated the possibility that we can be reconciled to him. He sent his Son to die on the cross for sins. He sought us out in his prevenient grace when we were not looking for him.

He brought us to the possibility of repentance and faith. Then when we put our faith in the resurrected Lord Jesus Christ, We trusted in his faithful death. God gave us the Holy Spirit as a down payment of a glory yet to come, a guarantee of our coming inheritance, a seal of his ownership of us. He forgave us of past sins. He justified us, putting us in a right relationship with him. He adopted us as his children.

He purified us of our uncleanness. He sanctified us through his Spirit, setting us apart as his own. He regenerated us to new life. He made a new creation. We were born again.

We are now "in Christ," just as Christ is in us. We have been crucified with Christ. Now we live in the life of the risen Christ. We are at peace with God. We have hope of the resurrection and finally receiving the glory God originally intended for humanity to have in the creation.

2. Paul's opponents in the early church did not make a distinction between those parts of the Jewish Law that were "moral" and those that might be considered "ceremonial." In fact, Paul himself did not explicitly divide up the Law in this way. However, Paul did seem to distinguish between parts of the Jewish Law that were specifically for Jews and parts that were more universal in scope. These parts correspond roughly to the later Christian distinction between the "ceremonial" and "moral" parts of the Law. [1]

So for Paul's opponents, he seemed to be encouraging sin when he told Gentile believers that they were not bound by "works of Law." He records one of the rumors about him. He is accused of saying, "Let us do evil so that good may come" (Rom. 3:8). Romans 6-8 is more or less a defense against this charge.

"What then are we to say? Should we continue in sin in order that grace may abound? By no means! How can we who died to sin go on living in it?" (Rom. 6:1-2). Here Paul is not talking about the parts of the Law that are specifically for Jews but what we might call today the "moral" parts of the Law, the universal parts. When we were raised with Christ, we were raised to "newness of life" (Rom. 6:4).

Accordingly, we must not "let sin exercise dominion in your mortal bodies, to make you obey their passions" (Rom. 6:12). Since Paul talks about not obeying Sin, he clearly is not talking about some legal situation. That is, he is not saying that God considers us to be righteous because of Jesus, even though we are not really living righteously. Paul is clearly talking about how we live, a real change in our lives.

"Just as you once presented your members as slaves to impurity and to greater and greater iniquity, so now present your members as slaves to righteousness for sanctification" (Rom. 6:19). Again, Paul is talking about real life consequences that come from the Spirit inside us. Romans 12:1-2 draws out the ethical implications of the entire first eleven chapters of Romans: "Present your bodies as a living sacrifice... Do not be conformed to this world."

3. The Holy Spirit thus empowers a Christian to live a life that is not characterized by sin. "Those who have been born of God do not sin, because God’s seed abides in them" (1 John 3:9). That is not to say that it is impossible for believers to sin (1 John 2:1). Indeed, much of 1 Corinthians is directed at Corinthians who continue to sin even though they should not. "I could not speak to you as spiritual people, but rather as people of the flesh, as infants in Christ... for you are still of the flesh. For as long as there is jealousy and quarreling among you, are you not of the flesh, and behaving according to human inclinations?" (1 Cor. 3:1, 3).

However, sinning and giving into temptation should not be the norm for a Christian. "No testing has overtaken you that is not common to everyone. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tested beyond your strength" (1 Cor. 10:13).

It is popular to see Romans 7:14-25 as the ongoing struggle of a believer with temptation and sin. However, the context in Romans 6 and 8, not to mention the first part of Romans 7, make it clear that Paul is not talking about the Christian in these verses but about a person who wants to keep the moral part of the Law but does not yet have the power of the Spirit to do so. Romans 8 gives the conclusion: "The law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death" (8:2).

4. John Wesley systematized these scattered dynamics of the New Testament into what he considered to be the normal storyline of a Christian, what he and others called the ordo salutis, the "order of salvation." God's prevenient grace leads to his convicting grace. Conviction is when the Holy Spirit convinces you that you need God's forgiveness. When we then repent and put our faith in Christ, we experience God's justifying grace. He then purifies us of sin and imparts true righteousness to us by his sanctifying grace. [2]

The Wesleyan tradition has historically distinguished between initial sanctification, progressive sanctification, and entire sanctification. While sanctification is a biblical term, these gradations are based upon the logical implications of the biblical text. That is to say, these are not exactly biblical terms themselves.

Initial Sanctification
Sanctification in the New Testament is when a person is purified from the stain of sin and set apart as God's. In theology, however, sanctification refers to the actual impartation of righteousness. At conversion, Wesley taught, a person is empowered to be victorious over Sin and temptation. A person will likely continue to struggle with temptation, Wesley taught, but they should largely be victorious over it. "Initial" sanctification thus refers to this initial cleansing from the sin acts of the past and the power in our lives by the Spirit to overcome the power of Sin. [3]

The power of Sin is the default force in this world that pulls humanity toward sin. Wesley, following Calvin and Augustine, thought of the power of Sin in terms of a sin nature inside us, the default tendency of humanity to commit acts of sin because of a nature we have inherited from Adam. In a previous article, we argued that Paul thought of this dynamic more as a power over the creation than nature inside us.

Although Wesley formulated his ideas in his own theological categories, we can see his idea of initial sanctification as a logical extension of the biblical text. A Christian may struggle with temptation after he or she receives the Spirit. But God has forgiven them of past sin acts. God has cleansed them of the stain of past sins. God gives them the power to live a life in which Sin does not rule over their actions.

Progressive Sanctification
Wesley believed that a Christian would continue to grow in righteousness. If a believer continues to struggle in various areas when they first believe, over time they should fall into temptation less and less. The person should continue to grow.

We saw in 1 Corinthians 3:1-3 above that some believers remained "in the flesh" even after they became Christians. They were like babies and needed to grow up. Some of the New Testament is dedicated to this strange problem. How can a person continue to sin after they have God's Spirit within them.

Wesley thus was playing out logically and systematically what the biblical text says here and there about the need for believers to become more and more victorious over temptation as they progress through the Christian life. By "progressive sanctification," Wesley referred to the continued growth of a believer after conversion and the fact that it should become easier and easier to fight temptations to sin the longer a person is in Christ.

Entire Sanctification
This process of sanctification, Wesley believed, should climax in a moment of "entire" sanctification. This moment in an individual's salvation story is the one that requires the most logical and experiential construction beyond what the biblical text. Wesley himself referred to this moment in the life of a believer as achieving Christian perfection, drawing on passages like Matthew 5:48 and Hebrews 6:1. [3]

The wording of "entire" sanctification comes from 1 Thessalonians 5:23: "May the God of peace himself sanctify you entirely; and may your spirit and soul and body be kept sound and blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ." Paul here of course was speaking informally. He was not speaking of a systematic doctrine or of a crisis experience in this verse. He was speaking, first, to the entire community more than to each person as an individual. He was speaking of his hope that there would be no sin at all among them--that any sin would be removed--as well as that the community would remain spotless until the point of Christ's return.

But Wesley and the Wesleyan tradition systematized these elements. Wesley believed that a Christian would come to another moment of crisis, even after conversion. A person would experience God's convicting grace again, this time of the fact that the power of Sin still had some power in one's life, even if it was not often victorious. A person would be aware of the sin nature within. This would lead to repentance and faith again, this time to experience a moment of entire sanctification. Wesley characterized this state as one of perfect love, of 1) loving God with all one's heart, mind, soul, and strength and 2) loving our neighbor as oneself (e.g., Matt. 22:34-40).

While there is no systematic statement like Wesley's in the Bible, we can see that the components are there and that we can construct such an event logically and experientially. We regularly find Christians who are still "fleshly" or carnal in the manner of 1 Corinthians 3:1-3. They should not have sin in their lives. They should not struggle so much with the power of Sin, but they do.

Believers often come to a point in their walk with Christ where they realize the existence of undiscovered sin or unsubmitted aspects of our lives. Wesley more than anyone else in Christian history draws our attention to the need for us to surrender ourselves completely to God. True, we will not always know every bit of ourselves. True, our lives are always changing. New areas to submit will always arise.

But Wesley prompts us to ask, "Have I given everything to God that I know to give? Am I willing to do anything the Lord would call me to do? Will I sign over the deed to the property of my life, beyond any individual room in the house? Will I give God the whole house of my life? Will I commit to give God every knew part of my life that I discover?"

This level of commitment usually comes down to a final decision. There will often be one final area of hold out, one final part of our lives that is harder to surrender completely to God than the others. For this reason, more than any, the moment of final surrender is usually a crisis moment, an event. We cannot logically be completely sanctified, completely God's, unless we are completely surrendered. [5]

Wesleyans thus speak of complete surrender and consecration of ourselves to God as our part in entire sanctification (although even that is empowered by the Spirit). Then God responds with full empowerment, full sanctification. How, after all, can we be fully empowered by the Spirit if we are not fully surrendered?

5. In 1739, Charles Wesley, the brother of John Wesley, wrote the words to the hymn, "O For a Thousand Tongues to Sing." One of the verses begins by saying, "He breaks the power of canceled sin, he sets the prisoner free." Charles was not actually talking about entire sanctification in this verse but about what he and John believed should be true of every Christian.

When we become a Christian and receive the Holy Spirit, God breaks the power of Sin over our lives. The lives of Christians from that point on should not be typified by acts of sin. Rather, we should walk in a newness of life. The more of our lives we surrender to God, the more empowered for righteousness we will be.

And when we surrender ourselves fully to God, as much as we know to do, then we are wholly God's. Then it should cease to be a struggle to love God and to love our neighbor. It should become easy to do the good we know to do. We should be able to love others with delight and not only with effort.

The power of the Spirit breaks the power of Sin.

Next Sunday S9: The dead in Christ will rise.

[1] The sacrificial parts of the Jewish Law seem to fall into a third category for Hebrews, namely, parts of the Jewish Law that were fulfilled in Christ. Meanwhile, the civil law of Israel had much to do with its Ancient Near Eastern context and so was very specific to its today, although we can still discern universal principles in it.

[2] Wesley's classic sermon in this regard is "The Scripture Way of Salvation."

[3] In general, I am capitalizing the word Sin when it refers to the power of Sin rather than individual sin acts.

[4] Unfortunately, neither of these verses will bear the load Wesley wanted them to bear. Most versions rightly translate Hebrews 6:1 as "maturity" rather than "perfection." Meanwhile, Matthew 5:48 is talking more informally of loving everyone rather than just our neighbors--going the whole way and being "complete" in our love. Wesley took informal comments and made them into systematic formulae.

[5] John Fletcher was the first person in the Methodist tradition to equate this crisis moment with the Spirit-fillings of Acts. Wesley, however, did not formulate Christian perfection in terms of Acts, even if there is some evidence that he was favorable toward Fletcher's use of Acts. However, almost no contemporary biblical scholar in any tradition would now interpret Acts in that way. See the previous article on the Spirit in conversion.

Sunday, February 08, 2015

S7. God adopts us as his children; we are born to new life.

This is the seventh post in a unit on salvation in my ongoing series, theology in bullet points. The first section had to do with God and Creation, and I have also finished units on Christology and Atonement.
________________________________
God adopts us as his children and we are born to new life.

1. Adoption is one of the New Testament images Paul uses to describe what happens especially to Gentiles when they believe. In adoption, God takes those who were not his children and makes them his children. While it should have gone without question that Jews would remain God's children, Paul was distressed to find that the Jews in his day largely did not believe (Rom. 9:2). Many of them were cut out of the tree, even though they were natural branches (Rom. 11:17-24).

Nevertheless, God called him to be a minister to the Gentiles (Gal. 2:7-8; Rom. 11:13). He became a minister of reconciliation (2 Cor. 5:18). Now non-Jews could also become sons and daughters of God. "In Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith. As many of you as were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus"(Gal. 3:26-28).

Paul uses this adoption language, interestingly enough, of both Jew and Gentile. Jews were adopted as God's children long ago (Rom. 9:4). Now non-Jews could be adopted as well. But each individual, whether Jew or Gentile, needed to be adopted now (Gal. 4:5). The key to adoption, as we saw in the previous article, is the Holy Spirit. "You did not receive a spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received a spirit of adoption. When we cry, 'Abba! Father!' it is that very Spirit bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God" (Rom. 8:15-16).

Adoption is of course a metaphor, an image to help Paul's churches conceptualize their new identity in Christ. His churches would have understood the metaphor in terms of adoption in that day. Here it is significant to note a key difference with today. We almost always adopt individuals when they are children. But in the ancient world, adoption was often done as adults. For example, Julius Caesar adopted his nephew Augustus, who later became emperor, so that he would become his heir. In some cases, an adopted child might be considered more the child of the adopter than biological children, because they were chosen.

We thus should not in any way minimize the image of God adopting us as his children. Adopted children were every bit as much the children of a father in the ancient world as biological children. And so of course it should be today.

2. Paul goes on in Romans 8:17 to say that if God has adopted us as children, then we are his heirs, "heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ—if, in fact, we suffer with him so that we may also be glorified with him." In fact, Paul shifts the imagery in Romans 8:23 to speak of our adoption taking place at the point of resurrection. In that verse, he speaks of the coming moment when our bodies are "redeemed" from their current enslavement to corruption in this world and they are transformed to become like Christ's resurrection body. We will explore this aspect of adoption in a later article.

3. The New Testament not only uses the image of adoption when it speaks of those who become God's children. It also uses the images of new birth and regeneration. Those who were not alive become alive, and those who were dead come back to life.

Probably the best known use of this metaphor is in John 3, where Jesus is talking to Nicodemus. "You should not be surprised at my saying, 'You must be born again'" (John 3:7, NIV). [1] "What is born of the flesh is flesh, and what is born of the Spirit is spirit" (John 3:6). The kind of birth Jesus has in mind is thus not physical birth, but a spiritual birth. Note that this image of the Spirit as the beginning of a believer's life fits neatly with Paul and Acts, where receiving the Spirit is the key moment in becoming part of God's people.

"If anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here! (2 Cor. 5:17). [2] Titus 3:5 says, God "saved us, not because of any works of righteousness that we had done, but according to his mercy, through the water of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit." Note again the association of the Holy Spirit with regeneration, along with baptism as the outward sign of the work the Spirit does in the heart.

1 Peter 1:3 similarly says, "By his great mercy he has given us a new birth into a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead." Not only hope, but the believer now should "walk in newness of life" (Rom. 6:4). The new life is not just some fiction. It is a changed life, as we will explore further in the next article.

4. Although we will discuss baptism in a later section on the sacraments, it should be mentioned here in this section on salvation. Baptism is the use of water to symbolize the washing of the sins of an individual. When practiced by immersion, it symbolizes the death of the individual to sin and then the rising out of the water to new life (Rom. 6:4).

Arguably, baptism is not an essential element in the passing from death to life. In Acts 10, Cornelius receives the Holy Spirit and is now part of the people of God before he is baptized. Similarly in Acts 8, the Samaritans are baptized and are not in the people of God because they have not received the Holy Spirit. [3]

Nevertheless, baptism is a normal element in conversion. It is the consistent pattern of the New Testament that those who become believers be baptized. There is thus every reason to include it in the process of conversion and no reason not to practice it. See the later article on baptism in the section on the Sacraments. [4]

5. Several of the passages above hint and what may have actually been the key feature of crossing from death to life for Paul himself. Romans 6:4 associates baptism both with our death and our new life. But a key phrase in this regard is that we are buried "with Christ."

For Paul there is a kind of mystical union that takes place between us and Christ when we become Christians. The Holy Spirit is surely the mechanism for this "mystical participation" in Christ. By way of the Spirit, Christ is in us (Rom. 8:10). And yet, in some way, we are now in Christ as well.

First, we die with Christ. "I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but it is Christ who lives in me" (Gal. 2:19-20). We are buried with Christ (Rom. 6:4). We are dead to sin (Rom. 6:2, 11). "If anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here! (2 Cor. 5:17).

We are incorporated into the "faithfulness of Jesus Christ," that is, his faithfulness to death, even death on a cross (Phil. 2:8). Although the expression, "the faith of Jesus Christ," is a matter of debate among Pauline scholars, many are sympathetic to the sense given it in the Common English Bible (CEB): "We are born Jews—we're not Gentile sinners. However, we know that a person isn't made righteous by the works of the Law but rather through the faithfulness of Jesus Christ. We ourselves believed in Christ Jesus so that we could be made righteous by the faithfulness of Christ and not by the works of the Law" (Gal. 2:15-16).

Galatians 2:20 in the CEB is even more intriguing: "The life that I now live in my body, I live by faith, indeed, by the faithfulness of God’s Son, who loved me and gave himself for me." This translation tries to capture what may very well have been another double entendre for Paul. We are both justified or declared right with God on the basis of our human faith, yet the only way this is possible is by our inclusion within the faithfulness of Jesus Christ.

"In Christ" is a far more common expression in Paul's writings that anything like justification. Paul arguably employed justification language when he was sparring with his opponents, but his more natural language is that of being incorporated into Christ.

So just as we have died with Christ, we also rise with Christ. We rise with Christ to a newness of life (Rom. 6:4), just as he rose from the dead. This is not just the resurrection of our bodies in the future. This is a change of life for us now on earth. We no longer let Sin rule in our bodies, because we have died with Christ to Sin (Rom. 6:2-3, 12). The power of the Spirit has broken the power of Sin over the believer (Rom. 8:2).

When a person receives the Holy Spirit, they are born again, born of the Spirit. They are dead to sin because they have died with Christ. They rise like Christ to new life. They are born again. In Christ, they now walk with a newness of life.

Next Sunday: S8. The power of the Spirit breaks the power of Sin.

[1] It is quite possible that Jesus in John wanted his audience to hear a double entendre with the word "again." It can also mean "from above," as the NRSV translates it. The kind of second birth Jesus has in mind, therefore, is a birth from above.

[2] Some people get upset with translations like this one, since they have grown up with a translation like, "he is a new creature" (KJV). Certainly we are welcome to debate interpretations, but it is only ignorance that gets upset at this translation, for the Greek simply says, "If someone in Christ, new creation."

[3] As tempting as it is to mention the thief on the cross, he really does not apply because he is before the arrival of the Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. He is still in the age of the old covenant.

[4] When 1 Peter 3:20 says that Noah's family were "saved by water" and then goes on to speak of baptism saving us by this washing, it should be taken as a metonymy. A metonymy is when something associated with something else is substituted in language for that other thing. So baptism here is not the actual action that saves us but it is very closely associated with what literally saves us, namely God's forgiveness and his filling us with the Holy Spirit.

Monday, February 02, 2015

S6. God fills us with his Holy Spirit as a seal of ownership.

This is the sixth post in a unit on salvation in my ongoing series, theology in bullet points. The first section had to do with God and Creation, and I have also finished units on Christology and Atonement.
________________________________
God fills us with his Holy Spirit as a seal of ownership on us.

1. We can repent, by the power of the Spirit. We have have faith, by the power of the Holy Spirit. God can forgive us. God can declare us cleared of all charges in his divine court and justified. We can even get baptized in water.

But the most fundamental feature of "conversion," of crossing from death to life. The "without which it hasn't happened" (sine qua non) is the Holy Spirit. "Anyone who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him" (Rom. 8:9). "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ so that your sins may be forgiven; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit" (Acts 2:38).

The Holy Spirit is God's brand on us, his seal of ownership. "It is God who... has anointed us, by putting his seal on us and giving us his Spirit in our hearts as a first installment. " (2 Cor. 1:21-22). The Holy Spirit is the "earnest" of our inheritance, which is both a guarantee of what is to come but also a down payment of it (2 Cor. 5:5; Eph. 1:13-14).

In the book of Acts, the Holy Spirit is the crucial factor in salvation. In Samaria, there is a problem because individuals have been baptized but not received the Spirit. Peter and John come up to solve this problem (Acts 8:14-17). In Acts 10:44-48, no further discussion is needed about the possibility that uncircumcised Gentiles can be saved after Cornelius and his soldiers receive the Holy Spirit. They immediately assume baptism is the next step, even though the cleansing of their hearts is already accomplished (Acts 15:9).

At Ephesus, Paul does not consider baptism in the manner of John the Baptist to be effective, because they did not receive the Holy Spirit with it (Acts 19:2). He lays hands on them after they are baptized in Jesus' name, and they receive the Holy Spirit.

In all these instances, the Holy Spirit is the most crucial element in "conversion," inclusion in the people of God, of salvation. Repentance is not always mentioned. Faith can surely be assumed in the vast majority of cases, but is not always mentioned. [1] Baptism can be after the fact. Justification is of almost no interest to Acts. But no one is part of God's people unless they receive the Holy Spirit. [2]

2. Justification and sanctification have traditionally been considered twin sides to conversion to Christ. Justification has been considered the legal side of conversion. We are declared "not guilty" in the divine court. We are considered to be righteous in God's eyes and the divine court. Righteousness is imputed to us as a legal fiction--we are not really righteous, but we are considered such in the eyes of the law. [3]

Sanctification is a term that has then been used to refer to the actual righteousness that God imparts to us. He actually makes us righteous through the Holy Spirit that he imparts to us. The Wesleyan tradition sometimes calls this event, "initial" sanctification. God purifies us of our sins and positively makes us righteous. In Wesley's view, the person who is born to new life by the Spirit may still struggle against sin, but should still be able to make the right choices when faced with temptation because the Holy Spirit is within us.

There is nothing wrong with this theology, although it is probably not what sanctification terminology means in the New Testament. To "sanctify" (hagiazo) means to make holy (hagios). To be holy means, in its oldest meaning, to set something apart as God's. It is hard for us in our Western paradigms to make sense of this idea. Perhaps you might think of magnetizing something or touching something that belongs to someone who gets very upset when you touch his or her stuff. [4] You take off your shoes when you are on holy ground (e.g., Exod. 3:5). You treat the holy with great reverence and respect--it belongs to God.

Yet "to sanctify" also can have a sense of purifying something. For example, in Hebrews, to be sanctified has a primary sense of being cleansed of sins (e.g., Heb. 10:10). [5] Believers are set apart as belonging to God (2 Thess. 2:13) and, accordingly, they are not only purified from sin but must remain pure and undefiled (e.g., 1 Thess. 4:3). [6]

3. We might ask, given our scientific worldview, what exactly or literally it might mean to be filled with the Holy Spirit. In Paul's worldview, he may very well have pictured literal wind of a sort within us, a little bit of heavenly substance. After all, for the Spirit to be a down payment, we might picture a little bit of what is to come inside us. Hebrews 6:4 speaks of "tasting" the heavenly gift.

With the clarity of Christian theology, we have to believe that the Spirit has always been everywhere present. The difference is thus more on what we experience than on the presence of the Spirit. The person filled with the Spirit is the person empowered to do God's will. Receiving or being filled or being baptized is thus language about what we experience than any real change in God's presence, which was always there to begin with.

It is the Holy Spirit that makes it possible for us to love each other, the essence of righteousness. It is the Holy Spirit that empowers us to make the right choices, to choose to do the right thing (in mind and body) rather than the wrong thing. This power in our thoughts and actions is God's gift to us, the stamp on our lives that shows we are his.

Those who have faith in the atoning death of Jesus and put their faith in him as Lord experience the power of the Holy Spirit over their lives. They are "filled" with the Spirit.

Next Sunday: S7. God adopts us as his children and we are born to new life.

[1] It is possible to be filled with the Holy Spirit without exercising faith, as happens to John the Baptist in Luke 1:15. John is filled with the Spirit before he is even born.

[2] Most consider "receiving," "being filled with," and "being baptized by" the Holy Spirit to be more or less synonymous expressions in Acts, all of which relate to conversion. See James D. G. Dunn, Baptism in the Holy Spirit: A Re-examination of the New Testament on the Gift of the Spirit (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1977).

[3] It is important for the Calvinist tradition to say that Christ's righteousness is considered our righteousness or that when God looks at us, he now sees Christ. This is a nice picture, but it is nowhere stated in Scripture. The meaning of 2 Corinthians 5:21 probably was not about a transfer of sin and righteousness. It is a poetic expression that might be more literally unpacked something like the following: God made Jesus, who did not have any sin, to become a sin offering so that we might demonstrate the righteousness of God. See N. T. Wright, "On Becoming in the Righteousness of God," Pauline Theology, vol. 2, ed by David M. Hay (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993), 200-8.

Having said that, it is hard not to hear a poetic play in 2 Corinthians 5:21, a poetic double entendre--Christ goes from righteous to sin. We go from sin to righteous. Nevertheless, while Paul does in at least one instance allude to a transfer of our miasma, our pollution and curse to Christ (Gal. 3:13), Paul never clearly speaks of the transfer of Christ's righteousness to us.

[4] I am not here emphasizing the angry part of this analogy, but the way a person engages something that is holy, namely, with great respect and caution.

[5] This is also more or less what Hebrews means when it speaks of "perfecting" a person who trusts in Christ's sacrifice.

[6] This language seems especially appropriate in the area of sexual defilement, where Paul retains traces of Levitical purity in his worldview.

Monday, January 26, 2015

S5. God justifies us in response to our repentance and faith.

This is the fifth post in a unit on salvation in my ongoing series, theology in bullet points. The first section had to do with God and Creation, and I have also finished units on Christology and Atonement.
________________________
God justifies us in response to our repentance and faith.

1. You may have heard the saying, "When I am justified, it is just-as-if-I'd never sinned." This childhood saying relates to the traditional sense that justification is about God declaring us legally right with him after he has forgiven our sins. In this way of defining the words, God's forgiveness precedes God's verdict that we are "not guilty" of all charges in his divine court. [1] Then after we are forgiven, God declares us to be in right standing before him. Justification is the act of God considering us in right standing before him. He declares us righteous, innocent, "not guilty" in the divine court.

In some respects, then, justification looks to our past, since "all have sinned" (Rom. 3:23). In our "natural state," as Wesley put it, we stand condemned before God, for "the wages of sin is death" (Rom. 6:23). [2] But despite our sins, God declares us righteous in his eyes. He gives us a clean slate legally.

Martin Luther emphasized that this righteous state was a legal fiction. That is to say, God's verdict is not based on what we really are. Like adoption, where someone who is not literally the child of another by blood is declared a child by law, so a person who is justified by God is not truly innocent but is declared so by God. However, this righteousness is as real as actually righteousness, even though it is "imputed," because God is the one who decides. God is the judge.

2. The normal process of coming to this righteous status before God begins with his prevenient grace. God reaches out to us. In our moral powerlessness, he gives us just enough power to respond to his call. If we continue to respond, he will give us the power to repent of our past sins and exercise faith in him.

Repentance is a regret for past sins and a turn away from them. It is not a regret of future punishment. It is a true desire that we had not done wrong and a sincere desire to change our actions in the future. In Acts 2:38, when the the crowds of Jerusalem realize that they have put their Messiah to death, Peter tells them to "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ so that your sins may be forgiven; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."

So also John the Baptist, in preparation for the Christ, preached a "baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins" (Mark 1:4). To the Gentiles, Paul in Acts 17:30 tells them that while God in the past has overlooked the ignorance of the nations, he was now commanding people everywhere to repent. Baptism, from this perspective symbolizes and sacramentally acts out the washing away of past sins.

If repentance is a negative action toward the past, faith is a positive action toward God in the present which continues into the future. Faith is more than mere belief or mental assent. Faith is a trust and conviction. It is a commitment that looks to the future. "if you confess with your lips that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved" (Rom. 10:9).

Paul here is talking here about a righteousness that comes by faith. Our English hinders us from seeing the full nuances of this passage. In Greek, the noun faith (pisteuo) and the verb believe (pisteuo) are clearly related. To believe can thus mean "to have faith," and faith can mean "belief." Here it is important to realize that words have more than one meaning and context determines which one is used in which individual instance.

In Romans 10:9, Paul is saying that, "if you have faith in your heart" in relation to what God has accomplished through the resurrection of Jesus, you will be saved. This act of faith is more than simply believing with your head that it happened. After all, it involves a confession that Jesus is Lord, that he is Master, that he is the king. "Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved" (Rom. 10:13), but this is a call that gives him allegiance, not a mere cry for help.

Similarly, the verb "to justify" (dikaioo) and the nouns "righteousness" (dikaiosyne) and "justification" (dikaiosis) are clearly related as well. To speak of the "righteousness that comes by faith" (Rom. 10:6) is thus to speak of justification by faith.

3. The basis of our justification is the atoning death of Jesus, "whom God put forward as a sacrifice of atonement by his blood" (Rom. 3:25). Empowered by the Holy Spirit, the mechanism of our justification is faith: "a person is justified by faith apart from works prescribed by the law" (Rom. 3:28). Then once God has declared us righteous before him on the basis of faith (cf. Rom. 4:3), we are at peace with God (Rom. 5:1). We are reconciled to him (e.g., 2 Cor. 5:19).

4. You will notice that most of the biblical references above come from Paul's writings in the New Testament, Romans in particular. Accordingly, it is significant to remember that the language and imagery we have been discussing is not the only language of salvation in Scripture. It is only one way of looking at salvation, and it was forged in Paul's debates with certain opponents in the earliest church.

Indeed, language of justification is not even the primary language of Paul's letters. It is chiefly confined to Romans and Galatians, where Paul was dealing with opposition to the way he viewed the salvation of non-Jews. "Justification by faith" thus was not the center of Paul's theology but one set of language he used with Jews who opposed the way he conducted his mission to Gentiles. Romans is not a systematic theology but a letter written in part to defend Paul's way of including Gentiles within the people of God without requiring them to keep the Jewish Law.

There are thus a number of nuances to Paul's language that we are prone to miss because we are no longer facing the situations he was facing. This fact does not undermine the truth of the theology of justification above. What it does is suggest that this language is only one way of expressing the process of our reconciliation to God.

For example, when Paul spoke of Gentiles not being justified by "works of Law" (Rom. 3:28), he clearly had the Jewish Law in view. And what works of the Jewish Law does he primarily have in view? Surely it is primarily matters that separated Jew from Gentile. In Galatians, circumcision is primarily in view. Romans speaks in more general terms, but the point is that Paul does not have mere "good works" in mind. That is not what he is talking about. He is talking about any sense that a Gentile has to keep the Jewish Law in order to obtain a right standing before God. [3]

It thus would go well beyond anything Paul had in mind if we were deny that faith involves an act of the human will. Yes, justification is a matter of God's grace (Rom. 4:16), but as we have seen in previous articles, grace in Paul's world was a gift disproportionate to anything the recipient might do. Grace did not imply, however, that the recipient did absolutely nothing to solicit or maintain the grace. The faith of Abraham by which God considered him righteous was an act on Abraham's part. It reflected an investment in God that went beyond mere assent.

5. Another debate about Paul's original meaning focuses on the phrase, "the faith of Jesus Christ" (Rom. 3:22; Gal. 2:16). Many Pauline scholars believe that this expression had to do with the faithfulness of Jesus in death rather than our exercise of faith in him. [4] This is not a denial that faith in Christ was part of Paul's equation, for these two verses also use the verb "believe" with Jesus as the object. However, it might shift the emphasis in justification even further away from our faith toward the action of Jesus and his faithfulness to death (cf. Phil. 2:8).

In our view, the bulk of Paul's references to faith in Romans 4 and Galatians 3 are surely to human faith. Nevertheless, it is quite possible that Paul's focal statements in Romans 3:22 and Galatians 2:16 did refer to the faithfulness of Jesus as the basis of our justification. Paul would be affirming again that it is the atoning death of Jesus that is the ground of our right standing before God.

Nevertheless, this discussion does free us up to see that Paul primarily saw Gentiles and Jews as putting their faith in God the Father (e.g., 1 Thess. 1:8). We also put our faith in Jesus' death. But for Paul, almost all the mentions of human faith have God as their object (e.g., Rom. 4:3, 24).

6. A final nuance to mention about Paul's language is that the phrase, "the righteousness of God," in Romans 1:17 almost certainly referred primarily to God's righteousness rather than human righteousness or justification. Again, this nuance does not contradict the theology above but it reminds us that Paul's argument is placed against a long backdrop in history that goes back to Psalms and Isaiah. If you look at Psalm 143:1, for example, God's righteousness and his faithfulness are put in parallel to each other. In Isaiah 45:8, God's righteousness and his salvation are parallel.

In short, while Paul does speak of human justification in Romans, the idea of "the righteousness of God" had a history that suggests Paul's audience would have heard it in relation to God, in the first place, rather than something relating to humans.

God justifies us, he declares us in right standing before him, on the basis of the atoning death of Jesus Christ. He does this in response to our faith in him and in the death of Christ, which presupposes our repentance for past sins.

Next week S6. God fills us with his Holy Spirit as a seal of ownership.

[1] John Wesley's understanding of justification by faith and conversion can be explored in numerous sermons, including "Justification by Faith" and "The Spirit of Bondage and the Spirit of Adoption," With regard to justification, Wesley largely followed the lead of Martin Luther.

[2] See especially "The Spirit of Bondage and the Spirit of Adoption" above.

[3] For a discussion of "works of Law," see especially the essays in J. D. G. Dunn, A New Perspective on Paul (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007), esp. 8-10, 121-40.

[4] The most notable proponent of this view is Richard Hays, The Faith of Jesus Christ: The Narrative Substructure of Galatians 3:1-4:11, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002).

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Epilog: Good News versus Soterian

It seemed appropriate to sit back and reflect a little after finishing Scot McKnight's book, King Jesus Gospel.  I had a sense of where I thought Scot would go with the book and in my mind he went half there.  I suppose it has a lot to do with the question he was posing.  What would a fuller sense of the gospel look like in contrast to what happens in an awful lot of American churches?

His answer is that the meaning of "gospel" is something much bigger than what he calls a "soterian" approach.  Since he has invented the word, it is completely appropriate.  A "soterian," as he defines it, is someone whose overwhelming focus is on getting people "saved."  He has made it clear elsewhere that he doesn't actually think the word "salvation" is this narrow in the NT.  What he is targeting is practices associated with a very narrow way of thinking about salvation.

To put it in my own way (which is much the same as Scot's), the gospel is, in the first instance, the good news about the inaugurated kingship of Jesus and the kingdom of God that he inaugurates.  I'm not too sure why this is so controversial in some circles.  People like Scot and Wright might debate some of the details, but it really isn't debatable.  End of story.

This original sense of the gospel is not "me" focused.  It doesn't center on me getting saved.  It is much bigger, much more important than me and my individual salvation.  I think what's really bugging McKnight (and Tom Wright before him) is the all-too-typical, shallow, self-centered focus of so much American Christianity, as if the center of the good news is me and what's in it for me.

Further, Scot is rightly concerned that so many Christians act like the whole deal is done once they "say the magic words."  There are many who believe in eternal security and go on to take very seriously the lordship of Jesus for the rest of their lives.  And there are some who act like once they've read the words on the card, they're done.  Eternal oops there.

Here are two further thoughts upon reflection:
1. God's creational good news
Scot says in the early chapters that the gospel relates to the "Story of Jesus" part of the overall Christian story.  I've hinted before that he is doing a dance between wanting to define words the way the NT does and doing theology, which almost always has to move beyond the specific words of specific biblical authors to formulate an integrated perspective.

The word "missional" does some of that.  I wonder what this book would have looked like if Scot had posed the question "missional versus soterian."  Then it would have more easily looked at a bigger version of the story.  It would have allowed us to talk not only of good news for humanity but about good news for the creation as well.  The NT doesn't actually use the word "gospel" in this way, but it is a valid theological broadening of the implications of the way the NT uses the word "gospel."

Missional has been somewhat of a buzz word, but it still seems to narrow God's purposes for the world to the area of saving.  I personally believe that beauty remains in the world, even after the Fall.  I find it hard to believe that every last bit of goodness flew out of the creation with Adam's sin, and the Bible certainly does not require us to believe that.

God thus has intentions for the creation that do not involve human beings and that are in addition to saving it.  The biggest story we can comprehend is the "creational" story.  I knew a student who pretty much lost his faith traveling the world after college (I've lost track of him).  It seems to me there is a faith crisis waiting to happen if we must limit God's walk with the world to the incredibly narrow story of Israel and story of the church.

I don't think most people have a sense of how few people God must care about if this is it.  We are so surrounded by Christianity that it is easy to assume that most people should know better.  Take a few months and travel through Asia.  Look at a map and compare the size of Judah to the rest of the ancient world.  Then read the book of Jonah. There is at least a potential difference between what Christ has done for the world and what the world knows about Christ.

2. A full switch to what God has done
I came to an ironic realization this morning.  In his chapter on salvation taking over the gospel, Scot pinpoints the Reformation as the point where salvation started on a trajectory to become more important than the gospel.  He says there that it did not happen at once--not with Luther and Calvin--but that it took a while.  It occurred to me where it most took place--with the Anabaptists!

It is the Anabaptist tradition that has been most influential on American Christianity and it is the Anabaptist tradition that has most focused on an event of faith once a person has reached an age of understanding.  With deep respect, I believe this is why I ended the book feeling like it had only gone half way.  As long as we are so focused on this event as the be-all-and-end-all of salvation, we will still ultimately be soterians.

Wesley was of course influenced by the Anabaptist tradition.  But we are not hindered as Wesleyans from recognizing that for Paul, the most important moment of justification and salvation is the final one.  Paul rarely--if even once--uses the word "salvation" in relation to anything but the final escape from God's judgment.  Ephesians 2:8 is the only possible exception I can think of, and even it may speak proleptically (poetically speaking of something that is still to happen but is so certain to happen that we can speak of it as already happened).

It is true that Paul predominantly speaks of justification in the past tense.  We can be justified now and this is incredibly important.  BUT the most important thing is that we are justified when we stand in the judgment.  "It is not the hearers of the law who are righteous in God's sight, but the doers of the law will be justified" (Rom. 2:13).  More important is the "day of wrath, when God's righteous judgment will be revealed.  For he will repay according to each one's deeds" (Rom. 2:5-6).  And this includes believers: "the work of each builder will become visible, for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each has done" (1 Cor. 3:13).

Paul's theology was not focused on a justification event in mid-life.  I personally don't think justification was the centerpiece of his theology overall--it was an issue that stood at the center of his debates with Judaizing believers and thus it comes up in Galatians and Romans.  I believe the central focus of Paul's preaching was the cross and what Christ had done.

But even when Paul argued over justification, his concern was with ultimate justification before God, not with a mid-life crisis event.  Certainly we should by all means seek God's justification ASAP.  We can and should be justified now.  But Paul was not arguing over the timing.  He was arguing over the basis.

The role of Acts in our thinking is significant here.  Scot takes the pattern "repent, believe, be baptized" as normative.  An important question is the context of Acts.  For example, these conversions are "first wave."  They refer to places where the tsunami of the gospel is reaching for the first time.  How might the process look different in a place where the wave is retreating?  It is an unexamined assumption that it would look exactly the same.

Even more crucial is the most important element of Acts' equation and one I find that an awful lot of people miss, namely, the Holy Spirit.  Repentance is incredibly important.  Faith is incredibly important.  Baptism is very significant.  But the sine qua non, the most crucial ingredient of all, is the Holy Spirit.  And here we have the precedent of John the Baptist to know that a child can have the Spirit long before they understand the gospel.  These are at least things worth some reflection.

I'll end with a reflection my colleague Keith Drury once made.  "There is no point in my life," he concluded, "at which I would have gone to hell."  His reasoning was thus, put in my own words.

"When I was a child, I did not know what it meant to have faith in God or confess Jesus as Lord.  If I had died at that point or if Christ had returned, God would have accepted me.  The first time I half way understood my need for Christ, I accepted his death for me.  I affirmed him as my king.  If I had died then or Christ had returned, God would have accepted me.  Although I have sinned since then, I have also confessed my sins without undue delay and asked God for forgiveness.  I do not believe there has ever been a time since I confessed Jesus as Lord that God would not have received me if I had died or if Christ had returned."

I could muse more, but I'll stop there (I'll put in a shameless plug for my life reflections on Romans book if you want more ;-). Let me only say that we, and Wesleyans in particular, should do some significant reflection before we conclude the "soterian" path within broader evangelicalism is the right one for us.