I am hopeful about today's coup by the army in Egypt and was encouraged to see a diverse group of people around the army leader, including the head of the Coptic Church, the Nobel Prize winning nuclear physicist Elbaradei, and the head of their supreme court. I also appreciated the wisdom of the US administration in telling the outgoing president that democracy is not just about having elections.
What that meant, of course, is that a democracy is not about letting the majority have its way to the detriment of minority groups, such as what the Muslim Brotherhood was doing in moving toward an Islamic state in Egypt. Democracy is about creating a space for the minorities as well.
This is of course true in America as well. This is the wisdom of the separation of church and state, which of course should not be interpreted as anti-religion or non-religion but as religion neutral. This is why we cannot pass laws in America that are specifically Christian.
Showing posts with label church and state. Show all posts
Showing posts with label church and state. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 03, 2013
Monday, October 17, 2011
Separation of church and state
I wrote this textbox this morning:
____________
A very controversial issue in American politics is the idea of the “separation of church and state.” The first amendment to the Constitution says that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” This basic right is usually referred to as “freedom of religion.”
However, there are differing interpretations of the “establishment clause” current in America today. For some, it means that the government cannot be involved in anything religious at all. Accordingly, those who interpret the clause in this way believe it illegal for any Christian symbols to be present in the houses of government (e.g., the Ten Commandments in a courthouse) or for prayer to be present in public schools.
The other interpretation is that the government cannot endorse any specific religion. When interpreted this way, the key is that no one religion or religious viewpoint be taught exclusively. Ten Commandments can be present in public forums if they represent traditions of law rather than an endorsement of Jewish or Christian religion. Prayer can take place as long as it is generic or as long as prayer is offered from more than one faith. Certainly if children in the schools want to pray, it would violate their freedom of religion to prohibit it, unless their prayer was proving disruptive.
Religious neutrality on the part of the government fits well with the notion of the Constitution as a social contract. All individuals have the right to practice their own religion as long as it does not harm others. The government thus serves as moderator rather than proponent of specific religious beliefs (while protecting certain more basic ethical principles). This perspective was also forged in the religious persecution of Europe that drove so many to America (e.g., the Pilgrims) and that was also part of the history of American colonies such as in Puritan New England.
____________
A very controversial issue in American politics is the idea of the “separation of church and state.” The first amendment to the Constitution says that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” This basic right is usually referred to as “freedom of religion.”
However, there are differing interpretations of the “establishment clause” current in America today. For some, it means that the government cannot be involved in anything religious at all. Accordingly, those who interpret the clause in this way believe it illegal for any Christian symbols to be present in the houses of government (e.g., the Ten Commandments in a courthouse) or for prayer to be present in public schools.
The other interpretation is that the government cannot endorse any specific religion. When interpreted this way, the key is that no one religion or religious viewpoint be taught exclusively. Ten Commandments can be present in public forums if they represent traditions of law rather than an endorsement of Jewish or Christian religion. Prayer can take place as long as it is generic or as long as prayer is offered from more than one faith. Certainly if children in the schools want to pray, it would violate their freedom of religion to prohibit it, unless their prayer was proving disruptive.
Religious neutrality on the part of the government fits well with the notion of the Constitution as a social contract. All individuals have the right to practice their own religion as long as it does not harm others. The government thus serves as moderator rather than proponent of specific religious beliefs (while protecting certain more basic ethical principles). This perspective was also forged in the religious persecution of Europe that drove so many to America (e.g., the Pilgrims) and that was also part of the history of American colonies such as in Puritan New England.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
