Saturday, April 01, 2006

Tongues 1

I don't know how much I will blog on tongues, but this entry hath come forth.

What are tongues?
The Greek word glossa means "tongue" (as in the organ in your mouth) but also by extension, "language" (the thing your tongue speaks). Paul mentions the "tongues of humans and angels" in 1 Corinthians 13:1, and the fact that the Testament of Job tells of Job's daughters speaking in angelic tongues leads us to take "angels" seriously in this verse (although some argue it is a later Christian addition to the text). In other words, when certain non-Christian Jews spoke in "tongues," they apparently believed they were speaking in angelic languages.

Were they? Were the Corinthians possibly speaking in angelic languages? I personally doubt it, but must remain open to the possibility. Paul speaks of the "third heaven" (2 Cor. 12:2) and likely alludes to the dead "under the earth" (Phil. 2:10), but I see such language as God incarnating truth in their ancient worldview. Of course don't take me to believe the sun goes around the earth just because I might occasionally say something about the "sun setting." So we have at least three possibilities: 1) sometimes people do speak in angelic languages, 2) Paul never really understood the phrase "angelic languages" literally in the first place, and 3) while he may have thought of them literally, this is an instance of God revealing something through their ancient worldview.

We actually get mixed signals on whether tongues are human languages (xenoglossia) or not in the biblical texts. In Acts 2, the most obvious interpretation is that the disciples are speaking in human languages. Jews hear the gospel proclaimed in their own tongues from all around the Mediterranean Sea. On the other hand, Paul speaks of the tongues at Corinth more in terms of "the tongues of angels." They do not pray with their minds (14:10, 19). The words are unintelligible (cf. 14:7-11). And Paul's presumption is that unbelievers will not understand them (14:21-23).

So the Bible implies that tongues might be human languages or they might be something else that Paul alludes to in one way or another as "tongues of angels."

I might point out that in something like its 1 Corinthians 14 variety, tongues seems to be a pan-religious phenomenon. I have already mentioned non-Christian Jews above who apparently spoke in tongues. I do not feel it necessary to say that such individuals were demon possessed or that Satan was in these instances counterfeiting the genuine article. The most logical explanation to me is that certain brains are just wired to have these kinds of experiences. And in the case of Christians, God sanctifies the experience as a means of grace. This is just my personal hunch as to what is going on in the vast majority of cases where tongues is spoken today. I am open to other possibilities.

So the Bible refers to two different kinds of activity as speaking in tongues. First, in Acts 2 individuals speak in tongues in a way that serves as a witness to unbelievers. Second, in 1 Corinthians 14 Paul speaks of tongues that shouldn't be done around unbelievers (glossolalia). But the biblical text refers to both as tongues. You cannot tell by the word "tongues" itself which the Bible refers to apart from context.

4 comments:

Keith Drury said...

SIDEBAR: I heard about a scientific study that actually recorded the "heavenly languages" spoken in scores of tongues-speaking Pentecostal churches and studied this heavenly language to figure it out linguistically.

Alas, they found no firm heavenly language at all--not match up between the various spoken utterances.

But, perhaps one could argue that the "heavenly language" is different for every speaker and listener -- completely indivualized languages! {prompt: post mods applaud at this point}
(I know, I know--this is a useless comment...only 1 cup of coffee yet)

Ken Schenck said...

Or perhaps, like the NT's interpretation of some of the OT, maybe the moment of interpretation is an equally or even more important moment of inspiration! Like the story I heard of a German who prayed in his mother tongue in a tongues speaking church only to find someone interpreting his words to the church... quite differently. Maybe the interpretation was still inspired??!!

P.S. Beware of urban legends about tongues :-)

theajthomas said...

I think sometimes the gift of toungs is more about the hearer. At my Grampys church once there were two ladies visiting from sweeden and they spoke very little english. They struggled through the worship time trying to understand but when the pastor stood to preach they heard him in perfect sweedish even though the rest of the congregation heard him backwoods maine english. That seems to me to be what was happening in acts 2 because you had large groups of people from different langauges all hearing in their language. It seems more logical than that each Disciple was given a different langauge and they had to figure out what it was and then split the crowd accross linguistic lines andn then start preaching. That would have been chaos.

Mike Cline said...

This is on tongues...ok April Fools, I have nothing to say.

http://www.sojo.net/index.cfm?action=sojomail.display&issue=060401&cookies_enabled=false

But you are going to love that link!
Especially the Left Behind Series meets the four horseman of the Apocalypse of the NCAA March Madness tournament. Oh the bliss of good satire