Sunday, September 24, 2006

A Word from Christ to All of Us

I am promoting this comment to a regular post because it is the voice of Christ. You'll find it comes from Keith Drury under the previous post.

________________
I hate to read all this messy stuff about Asbury. I hate it, even though it may be needed.

I am not an Asbury graduate and admit I have not even been a great supporter of this Methodist-reforming Seminary. But a funny thing has happened to me as I have followed this messy plot... I find myself rooting for redemption and reconciliation at the school, like I am an alum! Perhaps I'm an idealist or I am hopelessly overcome by a conviction that good men who do bad things badly often see their need to back up and fix the mess they have made. Maybe it is my tendency to believe that the best men and women often are able to reach down deep and bring up the best from their hearts in times of crisis. But I have great hope that a resolution will occur that will make ATS and all its people better. It still can emerge from the garbage dump and division we see now. It can! I can’t remember who the old guy was who recited past crisis events at Asbury, but I too am an old guy who has seen this kind of stuff before.

Here’s one story: When I was an undergrad the President of my college (one who every single student and 90% of the faculty loved and admired) got crossways with his board and one of his administrators. It was messier than this. It got into the newspapers. It splattered all over everybody and “sides” emerged. The President refused the Chair’s direct order to pay the administrator’s salary which he was withholding (full disclosure—my father was the board chair). There was open rebellion on campus. The denomination’s General Superintendents were too weak to step in—believing “If you wrestle with a pig you both get dirty—but the pig likes it.” So they stood by and watched the fire.

With everyone watching the institution go up in smoke it got worse. Students transferred. Faculty floated their resumes. Board members resigned (including my dad) and some of my best friends who were more gifted at ministry than I was dropped out of school and went to Viet Nam, disgusted that “Christians could act this way.” Most never found their way back into the church, let alone the ministry. I still get emails from some of them. Bitter emails. Lives ruined. Faith abandoned. The fallout continues to today.

In the midst of that crisis that was far too severe for a 20 year old ministerial student to experience first hand I learned a most important lesson of life: Never, ever break a relationship. Sure you can disagree. Argue. Fight. Vote. Remove people from office. Politic. Line up votes even. But never ever break relationship with a brother or sister in Christ. Grab the “enemy” by the arm and go out to eat. Laugh. Tell stories. Grant your “enemy” the logic of their good arguments. Hug them and say, “I totally disagree with you 100% but I also love you 100%.” When they sabotage your career laugh lightly and walk away—God always will bring you back like a cork under water. When they manipulate and tell (what appears to be) lies correct what you can and trust that your friends won’t believe it, or at least your children won’t. Even as students we could see this was the solution. Fight in love.

Unfortunately the primary men in that squabble did not do what was obvious to us students. They continued offering their gift before the altar and refused to go to those who “had ought against them.” They exited different doors at the college. They ate together in clusters of like-minded “sides.” They were not “easily entreated.” In the end they sent the President packing and said, “There, that’s that.”

But the school never recovered. The sin got buried under the tent floor was never mentioned again. We “moved on” and “started fresh.” But the school would never again be the same. And the ruined lives are still scattered here and there.

So, two other quotes come to mind:

One comes from a similar crisis when the general board of The Wesleyan Church voted to close a college (in fact, this same college) over the unanimous opposition of the local board of Trustees. The faculty (and some of the board) of that school were doing and saying things that (appeared to be) wrong and nasty. A white-haired old statesman on the General Board gave me a quote worthy of this situation. He remarked, “These men are better men than they act.” Regardless of the theological soundness of the statement it was a wonderful quote that was full of grace. He understood that in a crisis (such as faculty losing their jobs by the closing of an educational institution) people sometimes act below who they really are in Christ. I am trying to have his attitude in this situation. (Sidelight: This man used to be on the ATS board and would have been the sort of giant who could have stood up to speak for God in this situation but he is no longer serving—so I’m hoping someone else “full of grace” will rise to take his place among the Trustees.) We all need to understand that in crisis “its is the liquor speaking.”

The second quote is an old African proverb: “Where two bulls fight the grass is trampled.” I am hoping and praying that the students and faculty at ATS will not abandon the school (or their faith) in this mess. Students (and to a lesser degree, faculty) are mere grass in this fight and they are powerless to stop the bullfight above them. But I am praying that they will hunker down and wait it out. These men-who-are-better-then-they-act (and women) may yet still act out of who they really are. There is still hope. Maybe there is no hope for Greenway, or faculty power, or trust in the trustees, but there is hope for students who have answered God’s call to serve the church where there will be plenty of people who need to be helped to act more like who they already are.

I too wish the board meeting were sooner. But at least there is time for the statesmen and stateswomen to decide they will risk their reputations to insist that Christ’s will be done in this situation. A few hours of prayer may be the best first item on the Trustees agenda. What does Christ want is the primary question. There is always a way to please Christ. After all, He is the primary “stakeholder.”

4 comments:

Ken Schenck said...

To me Keith's thoughts here are so on target. When I ask myself how holiness folk have conflict, it's not--as many think--that we do not fight for the cause we think is right. It is not at all that equally "sanctified" people will ultimately come to agreement as to what the right cause is. I don't think it means that power will not be used.

So how do holy folk fight?

First, I think they come clean as best they can. There's some gray point where denial and manipulation of situations stops and it becomes an open fight on the real issues. I think holy people can manipulate with power to good ends up to a point. But whenever that line is crossed, it becomes deceit.

Second, I think they swallow hard and relinquish their pride, even if they end up with egg on their faces. They "die to self," as the old holiness maxim goes. The greater good is the goal, not whatever personal advantage might come from the crisis.

I do not believe 1 Cor. 6's prohibition on Christians going to court is an absolute, but clearly when everyone is worrying about being taken to court, there is sin somewhere. In God's church people don't have take each other to court in situations like this one. If we were holier, the EC and Greenway and the faculty would all be able to come clean without fear of legalities.

I recognize the necessity of lawyering up, but it is a necessity that results from the fear of the sinful actions of others. Are you not defeated already and thinking as mere humans when this is so necessary? It makes me sick to my stomach--what holiness is this? It is only necessary because of "sinful natures." What a poor reflection on Christ!

Third, holiness folk forgive and are reconciled. The EC forgives those who have talked and worked against them, Greenway does the same, and so do the faculty.

There are a lot of holiness folk at Asbury. I can truly say that one of the greatest things about IWU is that it is filled with "holiness" folk--even among those who are Baptist here :-) At least for now, this is a holiness school through and through!

I don't know who, but I believe many at Asbury have crossed the line into sin in this situation, not because they are in disagreement, but in the way they are in disagreement. May the Lord cleanse our hearts from secret sins. May He draw them to our attention, and may we eagerly repent when He reveals our hearts to us.

Let this way of thinking be in us all, which was in Christ Jesus...

S.I. said...

good to hear/read. Definitely refreshing amidst some church splitting I'm seeing in my own hometown.

Ken Schenck said...

A Relevant memo from the President's Leadership Steering Team (PLST): Leslie Andrews, Bill Arnold, Larry Brooks, Pete Cates, Steve Harper, Hugo Magallanes, JD Walt

Date: September 26, 2006
Subject: Report to the community on the state of administrative matters at ATS

In order to reassure the seminary community with regard to the on-going conduct of administrative matters, the PLST will issue regular weekly reports on its activities and decisions beginning with this report. We wish to assure everyone that the administration of the seminary is proceeding in an orderly fashion according to best administrative practices, in spite of our present circumstances.

We want to share with you how we have been functioning since September 5, 2006. You may recall that the statement issued by the Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees dated September 5, 2006 stated, “During this interim, until the full board of trustees can meet, we request that the group known as the president’s leadership [steering] team meet weekly and to carry out, along with other administrators, faculty and staff, their assigned responsibilities, giving students full value for their investment in Asbury Seminary. We also request that our chairman meet with the senior leaders, representing the board, as much as he is able, until the full board can determine the longer term provision of institutional leadership in the president’s office.”

In accord with this instruction and in line with our normal administrative responsibilities, this group has been meeting weekly to discuss, make decisions about and implement actions that respond to the immediate needs generated by our circumstance. In addition, we have continued working on programs and plans that are a normal part of administration of this seminary. So, at the present time, we are dealing with both immediate issues and long-term planning. The Chairperson of the Board of Trustees, Dr. Jim Smith, has met with the PLST on three occasions since September 1 and will continue to meet periodically to help ensure that PLST planning is consistent with Board policy.

At our meeting today, September 25, we attended to the following agenda items:

* Received an update from Leslie Andrews on her on-going communications with accrediting agencies regarding the leadership situation

* Discussed possible budget reallocations to create funds for increased effort in student recruitment for Spring semester and next Fall semester

* Determined that the Enrollment Management Team is working on developing those strategies

* Entertained a proposal for the use of a cohort model for future programs in distance education

* Agreed to a proposal from Community Life to call our seminary to a day of prayer and fasting on October 17 and continual prayer leading up to and following that date

We would like to assure the community that, to our knowledge, all the information that can be shared relative to the leadership situation has been shared. The full board meeting called for October 17 will be the next occasion for resolution of the situation. We are unaware of anything that will happen between now and then.

Further, we want to make you aware that as administrators we are not a part of the process to determine the outcome of the situation. By necessity, and in compliance with accreditation standards, governance matters are separated from administrative matters. The PLST has been charged with the responsibility to manage the institution during this time of contemplation and decision. That is what we are doing to the best of our ability.

The PLST commits to keeping you informed with regard to the matters over which we have responsibility. If you have questions with regard to the activities and functioning of the administration, please feel free to talk with the vice president in charge of your area of the institution.

Anonymous said...

Boy I wish we always got this much info!