tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8355052.post933233533096723109..comments2024-03-28T09:52:15.415-04:00Comments on Common Denominator: NIV, pronounced dead at 37Ken Schenckhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09745548537303356655noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8355052.post-42779780715346496822010-11-02T09:21:08.651-04:002010-11-02T09:21:08.651-04:00NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!Kenny Piercehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14714984165284269777noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8355052.post-73381437367554042482010-11-02T07:01:20.768-04:002010-11-02T07:01:20.768-04:00The first thing I noticed was that it seems to re-...The first thing I noticed was that it seems to re-muddle Romans 1:17. TNIV as I recall goes to "righteousness of God," as most scholars think. New NIV keeps righteousness of God, but then says "a righteousness by faith...," which implies the older NIV translation's meaning, "a righteousness from God."Ken Schenckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09745548537303356655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8355052.post-76884554999551338282010-11-02T06:55:14.867-04:002010-11-02T06:55:14.867-04:00Well it's a good thing the ESV doesn't wea...Well it's a good thing the ESV doesn't wear it's theology on its sleeve! ;)<br /><br />Perhaps you could be a little more specific as to how the NIV2011 reverses the gains of the NIV? For one, they move to the use of "flesh" for sarx and away from what I thought was less effective: "sinful nature." I thought that was positive. <br /><br />What has reversed the gains of the TNIV?<br /><br />DanDanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17683809990540740131noreply@blogger.com