tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8355052.post8399732624676031431..comments2024-03-28T09:52:15.415-04:00Comments on Common Denominator: An Early Faith Community (5.4)Ken Schenckhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09745548537303356655noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8355052.post-33262026386969928722010-10-14T10:49:05.636-04:002010-10-14T10:49:05.636-04:00Thanks.Thanks.Richard Fellowshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06777460488456330838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8355052.post-12345132326805011122010-10-13T23:47:41.377-04:002010-10-13T23:47:41.377-04:00I don't mean to say there is consensus on any ...I don't mean to say there is consensus on any of these points and I agree with you that even "majority" opinions are fluid, especially in this day and age where anyone can get the scholarly driver's license. I don't think I took a stab at what percentage might argue for or against the destination of Romans 16.<br /><br />By the way, I acknowledge you in the preface to my now nearly published first book on Paul.Ken Schenckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09745548537303356655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8355052.post-36227426351112964992010-10-13T23:36:19.989-04:002010-10-13T23:36:19.989-04:00I think you might be a little out of date on a cou...I think you might be a little out of date on a couple of point. The view that Rom 16 was originally sent to Rome has been largely abandoned. Also many scholars now argue for the unity of 2 Corinthians, and some still place 2 Cor 10-13 BEFORE 2 Cor 1-9. Those who place 2 Cor 10-13 as a separate letter AFTER 2 Cor 1-9 are less than 50%, I would guess. In any case, appeals to consensus do not count for anything.Richard Fellowshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06777460488456330838noreply@blogger.com